Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01095
Original file (PD2012 01095.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1201095
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130416
SEPARATION DATE: 20020719


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PVT/E-2 (12C/Basic Trainee) medically separated for a left knee condition. The CI sustained a twisting injury to her left knee the day she began basic training. The knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of basic training, her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The knee condition, characterized as severe left knee pain and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient left knee, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) combined the two MEB conditions and adjudicated anterior cruciate (AC) deficient left knee as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 20% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in her application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting knee condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20020613
 VA - based on Service Treatment Record (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Knee, Anterior Cruciate Deficient 5257 20% Left Knee DJD 5257-5010 10% STR
Left Knee, Anterior Cruciate Deficient 5257 10% STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 0
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 21011 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left knee pain. The CI injured her left knee on the first day of basic training. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was consistent with ACL tear, and early degenerative joint disease (DJD). She was treated, but her knee pain persisted and an MEB was initiated. The MEB clinical evaluation was on 7 May 2002. On physical examination (PE), the CI was in no apparent distress. Left knee range-of-motion (ROM) was from 0 to 120 degrees. There was some tenderness to palpation (TTP) at the medial and lateral patellar facets. She had pain with patellar compression, but the patellar tendon was nontender. She had normal patellar glide and tilt, but an increased Q-angle. There was a positive Lachman, pivot shift, and anterior drawer; with signs of ACL disruption. Tests for varus/valgus laxity were negative.

The Board carefully reviewed all evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Army PEB coded the left knee condition 5257 (knee, other impairment of) and assigned a rating of 20% (moderate). The VA chose a different coding option, but also assigned a combined rating of 20% for the left knee. Based on the evidence in the service treatment (STR) record, the Board unanimously agreed that the CI’s left knee impairment was best described as “moderate.” There was insufficient evidence to support classifying the condition as “severe.” After due deliberation, the Board determined that a separation disability rating of 20% was warranted, due to the moderate left knee impairment. The Board tried to find a path to a rating higher than 20%, using other codes which could be applied to the left knee condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a rating higher than 20%, since the STR did not show sufficient evidence of a disabling joint abnormality which would justify a rating higher than 20%. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (resolution of reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the left knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Left knee pain, with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency 5257 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120709, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB ),

 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130009471 (PD201201095)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00737

    Original file (PD2011-00737.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (67U20/CH-47 Helicopter Repairman) medically separated for a right knee condition. Right Knee Condition . In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a dual coding disability rating for a combined rating of 30%, IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00496

    Original file (PD2012-00496.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the left knee injury condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB adjudicated a 0% rating based on full ROM without residual joint instability. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: Left Knee Injury s/p Anterior Cruciate Ligament...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00092

    Original file (PD2013 00092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as left knee severe degenerative joint disease (DJD), left knee anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, left knee lateral meniscus tear and medial meniscus tear, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. He had further knee re-injuries after the first two surgeries. The operative report described severe chondromalacial changes in the lateral compartment with osteophytic ridging in the patellofemoral joint, medial,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00481

    Original file (PD-2014-00481.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board then considered whether there was sufficient evidence to support a 10% rating for functional loss (§4.40, §4.45).The MEB examination in January 2006 recorded a history of left knee pain “sometimes,” and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00832

    Original file (PD2011-00832.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB and VA each coded the individual knees at 10% using the criteria for arthritis (5003), with the VA indicating a traumatic onset by using code 5010. Left Knee : With regards to the left knee, the Board considered that the preponderance of the record supported the 10% rating for the left knee for limited motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01645

    Original file (PD2012 01645.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Persistent Anterior Knee Pain Condition .The CI originally had a sport-related injury to his right knee in September 2001.A torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was addressed arthroscopically in November 2001,followed by rehabilitative treatment.The CI re-injured his right knee (buckled and popped) while stepping from an aircraft in January 2002, and required a right ACLallograft reconstruction in March 2002.He did well post-operatively with progressive physical therapy (PT) until another...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01456

    Original file (PD-2013-01456.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam DJD,Bilateral Knees...[Surgical Residuals]500320%Left Knee DJD, post Meniscectomy5010-525910%20031208Right Knee DJD, post ACL Repair5010-526010%20031208Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 (Including 0% R and L Knee Surgical Scars)20031208 Combined: 20%Combined: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20040310 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Bilateral Knee Condition . In the matter of the combined bilateral knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00064

    Original file (PD2013 00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “anterior knee pain after left anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). There was no instability and examination of ligaments of the left knee was symmetrical compared to the uninjured left knee. Both the PEB and the VA rated the condition as 10% for painful motion of a major joint with similar coding (5010-5003 and 5257-5010 respectively).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00504

    Original file (PD2011-00504.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was rated on one knee condition at 10%. Both knees R and L have laxity was not rated on both conditions. In the matter of the right and left knee condition (anterior patellofemoral pain), the Board unanimously recommends a separate disability rating of 10% for each knee, coded 5299-5260 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01117

    Original file (PD-2013-01117.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service IPEB – Dated 20011205 VA - B ased on Service Treatment Records (STR*)Condition CodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExams/p Left ACL deficiency and PCL Deficiency Following Reconstruction52570%S/P ACL and PCL Reconstruction, Left Knee with Scar525710%STR*Other x0 (Not in Scope)Other x5STR* Rating: 0% Combined: 10% Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20020903 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) *Service Treatment Record ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the impairment...